<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epic Win: Pre 9/11 Airport Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/</link>
	<description>Awesome things from our collective childhood. All nostagia suggested by you, voted by you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-26890</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-26890</guid>
		<description>A few years before 9/11, my dad was going through security when he realized he&#039;d forgotten to remove his switchblade knife. He told the security guy and was sure he&#039;d get it confiscated. The guy just flipped the blade out, held it next to something on his little podium/desk thing, and handed it back because it was less than four inches long. 

When I was waiting at the KC airport to fly to South Carolina to go to basic training for the Army, the other recruits and I all had to put our razors into a girl&#039;s bag that she was checking so they wouldn&#039;t be taken away. A little bit of contrast for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years before 9/11, my dad was going through security when he realized he&#8217;d forgotten to remove his switchblade knife. He told the security guy and was sure he&#8217;d get it confiscated. The guy just flipped the blade out, held it next to something on his little podium/desk thing, and handed it back because it was less than four inches long. </p>
<p>When I was waiting at the KC airport to fly to South Carolina to go to basic training for the Army, the other recruits and I all had to put our razors into a girl&#8217;s bag that she was checking so they wouldn&#8217;t be taken away. A little bit of contrast for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-23908</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-23908</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Kristen.  I hate not being able to say goodbye at the gate or meeting anyone there.  I don&#039;t want to have to do it outside security or at baggage claim.  I don&#039;t enjoy flying anymore because of all these stupid security procedures.

I would prefer airport security the way it was before 9/11 over the mess we have today.  It&#039;s too much of a hassle.  All it does is make us more obedient and complacent to government intrusions in our lives.  How much more are we going to take so we can &quot;feel&quot; safe, but not actually BE safe?  Where do we draw the line?

If we keep being nice, good, obedient citizens who blindly obey all these stupid rules without question, then we can kiss our country goodbye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Kristen.  I hate not being able to say goodbye at the gate or meeting anyone there.  I don&#8217;t want to have to do it outside security or at baggage claim.  I don&#8217;t enjoy flying anymore because of all these stupid security procedures.</p>
<p>I would prefer airport security the way it was before 9/11 over the mess we have today.  It&#8217;s too much of a hassle.  All it does is make us more obedient and complacent to government intrusions in our lives.  How much more are we going to take so we can &#8220;feel&#8221; safe, but not actually BE safe?  Where do we draw the line?</p>
<p>If we keep being nice, good, obedient citizens who blindly obey all these stupid rules without question, then we can kiss our country goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukethepcdr</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-19062</link>
		<dc:creator>dukethepcdr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-19062</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I say.  Whenever someone frets about air plane crashes or worries about terror attacks on a plane, I remind them that more people die from car accidents, falling in their own tub, drowning in their own pool etc. than have ever died from a plane crash of any kind.  I don&#039;t see anyone calling for a ban of cars (except for the really crazy among the environmentalists), tubs or home pools though.  I&#039;m sick to death of the security these days at airports.  It&#039;s such a pain!  And like he said, a really smart terrorist could still figure out a way around it.  For that matter, they could just bomb the airport without even getting on a plane.  Take Denver&#039;s airport for example.  Anyone can just walk in there and wander all over the place where there are hundreds of people and never get stopped by security.  You could take out three hundred people easily just by lobbing a bomb over the side of the railing of the top floor where the shops and restaurants are right down on the heads of all those people waiting in the maze to go through security.  Not that I plan on it or anything, just saying it would be really easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I say.  Whenever someone frets about air plane crashes or worries about terror attacks on a plane, I remind them that more people die from car accidents, falling in their own tub, drowning in their own pool etc. than have ever died from a plane crash of any kind.  I don&#8217;t see anyone calling for a ban of cars (except for the really crazy among the environmentalists), tubs or home pools though.  I&#8217;m sick to death of the security these days at airports.  It&#8217;s such a pain!  And like he said, a really smart terrorist could still figure out a way around it.  For that matter, they could just bomb the airport without even getting on a plane.  Take Denver&#8217;s airport for example.  Anyone can just walk in there and wander all over the place where there are hundreds of people and never get stopped by security.  You could take out three hundred people easily just by lobbing a bomb over the side of the railing of the top floor where the shops and restaurants are right down on the heads of all those people waiting in the maze to go through security.  Not that I plan on it or anything, just saying it would be really easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-19057</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-19057</guid>
		<description>I do miss the pre 9/11 airport. It made going to the airport less of a nightmare. To give you all something to think about the 9/11 attacks, all I have to say is that I was serving in the US Air Force on that day. I was stationed at Andersen AFB on the US territory of Guam and for us, we were waken up in the middle of the night after the 2nd plane hit the WTC. Long story short, a room full of Air Force personnel that night looked at the damage at the Pentagon shown on TV and collectively agreed that there was NO way a plane crashed into it. It appeared to us, who I would consider to be well informed and quite qualified to make a judgement in this matter, that some sort of missile hit the side of that building. Evidence? Complete lack of wing and vert. stabilizer (tail) debris. Neither would have cut through the building, they would have broken off in rather large chunks and strewn about the lawn. You may argue that the wings burned up due to the fuel lines to the engines, OK, but there isn&#039;t that much Jet-A (fuel) running through those wings compared to the fuselage and once that burns up, they would be detached from the fuel source so there would have been something left, and the vert. stabilizer had nothing flammable what so ever running through or near it, given that the 757 is a twin-engine aircraft, so there is NOTHING to allow it to catch on fire, short of an electrical fire which doesn&#039;t burn hot enough to completely disintegrate the vertical stabilizer.  We believed that night that some country was sitting off the coast of MD and shooting missiles into Washington DC. We turned out to be wrong, no there wasn&#039;t anyone sitting off the coast, however it was not an airplane either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do miss the pre 9/11 airport. It made going to the airport less of a nightmare. To give you all something to think about the 9/11 attacks, all I have to say is that I was serving in the US Air Force on that day. I was stationed at Andersen AFB on the US territory of Guam and for us, we were waken up in the middle of the night after the 2nd plane hit the WTC. Long story short, a room full of Air Force personnel that night looked at the damage at the Pentagon shown on TV and collectively agreed that there was NO way a plane crashed into it. It appeared to us, who I would consider to be well informed and quite qualified to make a judgement in this matter, that some sort of missile hit the side of that building. Evidence? Complete lack of wing and vert. stabilizer (tail) debris. Neither would have cut through the building, they would have broken off in rather large chunks and strewn about the lawn. You may argue that the wings burned up due to the fuel lines to the engines, OK, but there isn&#8217;t that much Jet-A (fuel) running through those wings compared to the fuselage and once that burns up, they would be detached from the fuel source so there would have been something left, and the vert. stabilizer had nothing flammable what so ever running through or near it, given that the 757 is a twin-engine aircraft, so there is NOTHING to allow it to catch on fire, short of an electrical fire which doesn&#8217;t burn hot enough to completely disintegrate the vertical stabilizer.  We believed that night that some country was sitting off the coast of MD and shooting missiles into Washington DC. We turned out to be wrong, no there wasn&#8217;t anyone sitting off the coast, however it was not an airplane either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-13726</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-13726</guid>
		<description>You are ALL retards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are ALL retards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pemigewasset</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-13059</link>
		<dc:creator>Pemigewasset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-13059</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about that, Operator.  I look at it like wearing your safety belt in the car, or having a fire extinguisher handy; you don&#039;t have to expect trouble to be prepared.  I don&#039;t fly much personally because it&#039;s too much to pay for all that hassle &amp; then having no wheels when you get where you&#039;re going... but I&#039;m awfully partial to my &#039;71 Riviera &amp; hate driving anything else (fire trucks &amp; ambulances excepted).

I don&#039;t get the sense that the American population is fearful.  Confuzed &amp; frustrated for lack of a solid target, but if terror was the goal I think they&#039;re as far from it as possible.  Admiral Yamamoto worried about awakening a sleeping tiger on 7 December &#039;41 &amp; I believe the terrorists have learned the same lesson.  Terrorism by definition is sneaky &amp; de-centralized though, so cranking up the war machine &amp; pummelling an enemy into submission is virtually impossible.  What we&#039;re faced with now is insidious complacency which will provide the avenue for another attack.  I don&#039;t disagree that sacrificing freedom for security is a execrable idea &amp; counter-productive exchange, but in that case we&#039;re talking about warrant-less wire taps &amp; domestic spying, not common sense safety.  There are many options, most of them unpalatable, but that shouldn&#039;t deter us from doing the right thing, especially when the other choices are convenient but unwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about that, Operator.  I look at it like wearing your safety belt in the car, or having a fire extinguisher handy; you don&#8217;t have to expect trouble to be prepared.  I don&#8217;t fly much personally because it&#8217;s too much to pay for all that hassle &amp; then having no wheels when you get where you&#8217;re going&#8230; but I&#8217;m awfully partial to my &#8216;71 Riviera &amp; hate driving anything else (fire trucks &amp; ambulances excepted).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get the sense that the American population is fearful.  Confuzed &amp; frustrated for lack of a solid target, but if terror was the goal I think they&#8217;re as far from it as possible.  Admiral Yamamoto worried about awakening a sleeping tiger on 7 December &#8216;41 &amp; I believe the terrorists have learned the same lesson.  Terrorism by definition is sneaky &amp; de-centralized though, so cranking up the war machine &amp; pummelling an enemy into submission is virtually impossible.  What we&#8217;re faced with now is insidious complacency which will provide the avenue for another attack.  I don&#8217;t disagree that sacrificing freedom for security is a execrable idea &amp; counter-productive exchange, but in that case we&#8217;re talking about warrant-less wire taps &amp; domestic spying, not common sense safety.  There are many options, most of them unpalatable, but that shouldn&#8217;t deter us from doing the right thing, especially when the other choices are convenient but unwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: operator</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-13043</link>
		<dc:creator>operator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-13043</guid>
		<description>That so many people would sooner choose safety over freedom means the terrorists won already.  They wanted to terrify people, being terrorists, and lo and behold people were appropriately terrified and made it obvious that they were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That so many people would sooner choose safety over freedom means the terrorists won already.  They wanted to terrify people, being terrorists, and lo and behold people were appropriately terrified and made it obvious that they were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pemigewasset</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>Pemigewasset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>Branniff!  LOL!  Ah, right next door to Piedmont I&#039;ll bet...

[sadheadshake] Everybody is much too emotional about this.  The truth is, until &amp; unless we take airport security seriously, like Israel, we&#039;re still horribly vulnerable.  Nasty things can &amp; will happen, it&#039;s just a matter of time.

Before you jump me, consider this.  I&#039;m a career medic &amp; firefighter.  Born &amp; raised in New Hampshire, Yankee native &amp; right on site for the main event.  I lost friends, professional &amp; civillian.  I remember the spate of hyper-patriotism immediately following &amp; it disgusted me because I KNEW it was shallow &amp; hollow.  Look at how little has been done once the immediate evidence of the aftermath was removed.

The dead know only one thing; it is better to be alive.  Were they able to view &amp; comment on our dissension they would encourage us to put away our egos &amp; work together to make things right.  Unfortunately, with politicians instead of leaders &amp; statesmen, we&#039;ll never have the unity of purpose &amp; global effect that America&#039;s Greatest Generation achieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Branniff!  LOL!  Ah, right next door to Piedmont I&#8217;ll bet&#8230;</p>
<p>[sadheadshake] Everybody is much too emotional about this.  The truth is, until &amp; unless we take airport security seriously, like Israel, we&#8217;re still horribly vulnerable.  Nasty things can &amp; will happen, it&#8217;s just a matter of time.</p>
<p>Before you jump me, consider this.  I&#8217;m a career medic &amp; firefighter.  Born &amp; raised in New Hampshire, Yankee native &amp; right on site for the main event.  I lost friends, professional &amp; civillian.  I remember the spate of hyper-patriotism immediately following &amp; it disgusted me because I KNEW it was shallow &amp; hollow.  Look at how little has been done once the immediate evidence of the aftermath was removed.</p>
<p>The dead know only one thing; it is better to be alive.  Were they able to view &amp; comment on our dissension they would encourage us to put away our egos &amp; work together to make things right.  Unfortunately, with politicians instead of leaders &amp; statesmen, we&#8217;ll never have the unity of purpose &amp; global effect that America&#8217;s Greatest Generation achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krafen</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12815</link>
		<dc:creator>Krafen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12815</guid>
		<description>The current security precautions provide little more than an illusion of security and a way for the politicians who passed the regulations to appear to be &quot;doing something.&quot; As an earlier poster rightly pointed out, aircraft hijackings and any hostage situation, for that matter, rely on the victims trusting that if they cooperate, they will not be harmed. After 9/11, it is highly unlikely passengers will trust hijackers. As a result, restricting things like nail files, scissors, and other items that could theoretically be used to harm someone provides no appreciable security benefit. 

Far more effective than silly carryon restrictions would be periodic ad campaigns reminding people that cooperating with hijackers is no guarantee of safety and may well assist them in killing more people. Such a campaign serves as a deterrent as it makes hijackings less likely to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current security precautions provide little more than an illusion of security and a way for the politicians who passed the regulations to appear to be &#8220;doing something.&#8221; As an earlier poster rightly pointed out, aircraft hijackings and any hostage situation, for that matter, rely on the victims trusting that if they cooperate, they will not be harmed. After 9/11, it is highly unlikely passengers will trust hijackers. As a result, restricting things like nail files, scissors, and other items that could theoretically be used to harm someone provides no appreciable security benefit. </p>
<p>Far more effective than silly carryon restrictions would be periodic ad campaigns reminding people that cooperating with hijackers is no guarantee of safety and may well assist them in killing more people. Such a campaign serves as a deterrent as it makes hijackings less likely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12801</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>Those were great times, visiting the pilot was one of the best experiences a kid could have (as long as you don&#039;t like gladiator movies...).  No one was all stressed out and you didn&#039;t need a cavity search.
Working for an electrical contractor in the 1990&#039;s, I can recall walking on board with my toolbag (because I didn&#039;t want to have it stolen). X-Acto knives, screwdrivers, ball-peen hammer = all good.  As long as you didn&#039;t have a gun or a bomb, you were good to go.  Now a nailclipper is considered a dangerous weapon, get real!  Water bottles (the kind you bring) are bad, the $3.00 ones they sell are OK.
It&#039;s amazing that one incident has to turn flying into a harassing experience.
BTW, I now drive rather than fly if at all possible, and it&#039;s not because of the &quot;terrorists&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were great times, visiting the pilot was one of the best experiences a kid could have (as long as you don&#8217;t like gladiator movies&#8230;).  No one was all stressed out and you didn&#8217;t need a cavity search.<br />
Working for an electrical contractor in the 1990&#8217;s, I can recall walking on board with my toolbag (because I didn&#8217;t want to have it stolen). X-Acto knives, screwdrivers, ball-peen hammer = all good.  As long as you didn&#8217;t have a gun or a bomb, you were good to go.  Now a nailclipper is considered a dangerous weapon, get real!  Water bottles (the kind you bring) are bad, the $3.00 ones they sell are OK.<br />
It&#8217;s amazing that one incident has to turn flying into a harassing experience.<br />
BTW, I now drive rather than fly if at all possible, and it&#8217;s not because of the &#8220;terrorists&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExGeeEye</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12692</link>
		<dc:creator>ExGeeEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12692</guid>
		<description>I just saw one such movie.  The title: &quot;Victory at Entebbe&quot;.

I&#039;m actually old enough to remember the incident portrayed in the film...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw one such movie.  The title: &#8220;Victory at Entebbe&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually old enough to remember the incident portrayed in the film&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12612</link>
		<dc:creator>Higa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12612</guid>
		<description>I brought along sharpened ice skates on a trip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought along sharpened ice skates on a trip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12611</link>
		<dc:creator>Higa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12611</guid>
		<description>just calm down. It&#039;s all going to be ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just calm down. It&#8217;s all going to be ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12610</link>
		<dc:creator>Higa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12610</guid>
		<description>I agree. I don&#039;t think anybody feels too threatened by nail clippers and a bottle of shampoo. The really sad thing is that there is a giant emergency axe right behind the pilots seat, easily accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I don&#8217;t think anybody feels too threatened by nail clippers and a bottle of shampoo. The really sad thing is that there is a giant emergency axe right behind the pilots seat, easily accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12609</link>
		<dc:creator>Higa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12609</guid>
		<description>and allow little kids to come up and see the pilot. That was fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and allow little kids to come up and see the pilot. That was fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understands_Reality</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12574</link>
		<dc:creator>Understands_Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12574</guid>
		<description>Ceefax, you fail at logical debate. On one hand, you make the assertation that the &quot;hijackers&quot; are not religious fundamentalists, but rather political extremists. Yet you&#039;re still willing to accept the whole &quot;we martyred ourselves in the name of Allah&quot; baloney. Of course, this is yet another false argument anyway. Please, Ceefax, go ahead and believe what you want. Ignore the fact that two of the &quot;Hijackers&quot; had listed the Pensacola Naval Air Station as their home address on their drivers licenses. Ignore the fact that 4 of the &quot;Hijackers&quot; are alive and well in Saudi Arabia, and immediately after 9/11 went to the international press and the US Consulate demanding an explanation as to why they were being accused of being Hijackers (and dead). Forget about the FBI touting &quot;Mohammed Atta&#039;s Last Will and Testament&quot; that they allegedly found in his checked baggage that, coincidentally, just happened to not make his connecting flight. Come on now--why would you pack your Last Will and Testament with you on a suicide mission that is surely to end in a fireball? Or moreover, why even check baggage on a suicide mission in the first place? No Ceefax, these things won&#039;t interest you. I&#039;m sure you can find something to watch on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ceefax, you fail at logical debate. On one hand, you make the assertation that the &#8220;hijackers&#8221; are not religious fundamentalists, but rather political extremists. Yet you&#8217;re still willing to accept the whole &#8220;we martyred ourselves in the name of Allah&#8221; baloney. Of course, this is yet another false argument anyway. Please, Ceefax, go ahead and believe what you want. Ignore the fact that two of the &#8220;Hijackers&#8221; had listed the Pensacola Naval Air Station as their home address on their drivers licenses. Ignore the fact that 4 of the &#8220;Hijackers&#8221; are alive and well in Saudi Arabia, and immediately after 9/11 went to the international press and the US Consulate demanding an explanation as to why they were being accused of being Hijackers (and dead). Forget about the FBI touting &#8220;Mohammed Atta&#8217;s Last Will and Testament&#8221; that they allegedly found in his checked baggage that, coincidentally, just happened to not make his connecting flight. Come on now&#8211;why would you pack your Last Will and Testament with you on a suicide mission that is surely to end in a fireball? Or moreover, why even check baggage on a suicide mission in the first place? No Ceefax, these things won&#8217;t interest you. I&#8217;m sure you can find something to watch on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12569</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12569</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid that I have to agree, at the very least with the intent of this Win. The last time I flew was just after 911, and I was told not to try flying again. At the time, they believed that a person who has frequent seizures (that the &quot;brilliant&quot; doctors can&#039;t seem to get under control) is some kind of threat to the airline. Because I hadn&#039;t given the airline a complete rundown of my entire medical history prior to flying, and they suddenly discovered that I wasn&#039;t in perfect health (as if the wheelchair wasn&#039;t a dead giveaway), they wanted to prevent me boarding the plane in Chicago. I told them that Chicago was a layover for me, and my final destination was in Kansas. I had no other way to get home (and for obvious reasons, I couldn&#039;t drive a car). The captain finally said I could get on the plane, but he also warned me that people with my health problems weren&#039;t allowed on airlines anymore. They have since &quot;discovered&quot; that siezure patients are not a threat to airline security, but with my host of associated health issues and all of the new security since added (like cavity searches), getting through security is now nigh impossible for people like me. In short, if I want to travel, I either have to pay 5 times what it costs to fly to get a sleeper car on a train or stay home. 

The problem with post-911 security is that it prevents many people from being able or wanting to fly. Honestly, who wants their vacation to start and end with being treated like an inmate at the state pen? For people with just about any kind of significant health problem, air travel becomes almost impossible. And then they wonder why the airlines are going broke...

It seems to me that trying to stop terrorists is like trying to stop hackers, botters, god-moders, and gold farmers on just about any MMORPG. If you try to catch every single one, you will just waste a lot of time and resources. The best option seems to be reducing the benefit of using such things. How about locking the captain and copilot in the cockpit from takeoff until landing? If no one can breach the cockpit, no one can take control of the plane. As for bombs, I doubt that you could stop them by catching all the pieces. It seems more reasonable to try and find out why people are taken in by radical whackos bent on destroying other people. Maybe there is no way to make peace with people who think of terrorism as a reasonable action, but it can&#039;t be any less effective than what we&#039;re doing now.

~Quag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that I have to agree, at the very least with the intent of this Win. The last time I flew was just after 911, and I was told not to try flying again. At the time, they believed that a person who has frequent seizures (that the &#8220;brilliant&#8221; doctors can&#8217;t seem to get under control) is some kind of threat to the airline. Because I hadn&#8217;t given the airline a complete rundown of my entire medical history prior to flying, and they suddenly discovered that I wasn&#8217;t in perfect health (as if the wheelchair wasn&#8217;t a dead giveaway), they wanted to prevent me boarding the plane in Chicago. I told them that Chicago was a layover for me, and my final destination was in Kansas. I had no other way to get home (and for obvious reasons, I couldn&#8217;t drive a car). The captain finally said I could get on the plane, but he also warned me that people with my health problems weren&#8217;t allowed on airlines anymore. They have since &#8220;discovered&#8221; that siezure patients are not a threat to airline security, but with my host of associated health issues and all of the new security since added (like cavity searches), getting through security is now nigh impossible for people like me. In short, if I want to travel, I either have to pay 5 times what it costs to fly to get a sleeper car on a train or stay home. </p>
<p>The problem with post-911 security is that it prevents many people from being able or wanting to fly. Honestly, who wants their vacation to start and end with being treated like an inmate at the state pen? For people with just about any kind of significant health problem, air travel becomes almost impossible. And then they wonder why the airlines are going broke&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems to me that trying to stop terrorists is like trying to stop hackers, botters, god-moders, and gold farmers on just about any MMORPG. If you try to catch every single one, you will just waste a lot of time and resources. The best option seems to be reducing the benefit of using such things. How about locking the captain and copilot in the cockpit from takeoff until landing? If no one can breach the cockpit, no one can take control of the plane. As for bombs, I doubt that you could stop them by catching all the pieces. It seems more reasonable to try and find out why people are taken in by radical whackos bent on destroying other people. Maybe there is no way to make peace with people who think of terrorism as a reasonable action, but it can&#8217;t be any less effective than what we&#8217;re doing now.</p>
<p>~Quag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12548</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12548</guid>
		<description>Try stripped, drugged, tied into a sack or straightjacket, and carried on &amp; off unconcious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try stripped, drugged, tied into a sack or straightjacket, and carried on &amp; off unconcious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cypherson</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12541</link>
		<dc:creator>cypherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12541</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  Guys, go watch the Current vid about 9/11 on youtube.  Seriously.  Tragic, sure, but come on.  It&#039;s the scape goat for anything these days, just say it&#039;s &quot;post-9/11 safety&quot; and that anyone who disagrees is &quot;unpatriotic&quot; and you have carte-blanche to do whatever you want.

9/11 was horrid, regardless of who was at fault.  The fact that it is being used to fear-monger and limit the freedoms of America and the world after the fact is truly tragic.

Remember, there is a distinct difference between remembrance and living in fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  Guys, go watch the Current vid about 9/11 on youtube.  Seriously.  Tragic, sure, but come on.  It&#8217;s the scape goat for anything these days, just say it&#8217;s &#8220;post-9/11 safety&#8221; and that anyone who disagrees is &#8220;unpatriotic&#8221; and you have carte-blanche to do whatever you want.</p>
<p>9/11 was horrid, regardless of who was at fault.  The fact that it is being used to fear-monger and limit the freedoms of America and the world after the fact is truly tragic.</p>
<p>Remember, there is a distinct difference between remembrance and living in fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happenstance</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12482</link>
		<dc:creator>Happenstance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12482</guid>
		<description>The key act that would&#039;ve prevented 9/11 was often discussed beforehand; rendering the cockpit inaccessible. Pilots said no; they wanted the option of wandering around the cabin and offering select folks admission to the Mile High Club. Even after 9/11, when the airlines and government finally (someone&#039;s always gotta die FIRST, y&#039;know) stood up to the pilots and said &quot;we&#039;re shutting the door,&quot; the pilots still needed to learn the hard way: in February 2002, a passenger on a United flight from Miami to Buenos Aires began pounding on the (newly-reinforced and locked) cockpit door; the pilot promptly OPENED THE DOOR TO SEE WHAT ALL THE FUSS WAS ABOUT and the passenger charged inside (the co-pilot smacked him in the head with an axe). As far as I know, the pilot faced no discipline for his action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key act that would&#8217;ve prevented 9/11 was often discussed beforehand; rendering the cockpit inaccessible. Pilots said no; they wanted the option of wandering around the cabin and offering select folks admission to the Mile High Club. Even after 9/11, when the airlines and government finally (someone&#8217;s always gotta die FIRST, y&#8217;know) stood up to the pilots and said &#8220;we&#8217;re shutting the door,&#8221; the pilots still needed to learn the hard way: in February 2002, a passenger on a United flight from Miami to Buenos Aires began pounding on the (newly-reinforced and locked) cockpit door; the pilot promptly OPENED THE DOOR TO SEE WHAT ALL THE FUSS WAS ABOUT and the passenger charged inside (the co-pilot smacked him in the head with an axe). As far as I know, the pilot faced no discipline for his action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceefax</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceefax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12481</guid>
		<description>Of COURSE people have taken them on.  The hijacker&#039;s behaviour isn&#039;t unusual at all - a religious fundementalist is a hypocrite and his motivations are politically rather than religiously based.  JESUS STOP THE PRESS! THAT&#039;S JUST IMPOSSIBLE, NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!

If it was a massive government conspiracy, why would they make such a basic error? If it was to be used to justify the invasion of Iraq, why not make the hijackers Iraqis rather than having them come from a country which is a bosom buddy of the Bush Mob?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of COURSE people have taken them on.  The hijacker&#8217;s behaviour isn&#8217;t unusual at all &#8211; a religious fundementalist is a hypocrite and his motivations are politically rather than religiously based.  JESUS STOP THE PRESS! THAT&#8217;S JUST IMPOSSIBLE, NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!</p>
<p>If it was a massive government conspiracy, why would they make such a basic error? If it was to be used to justify the invasion of Iraq, why not make the hijackers Iraqis rather than having them come from a country which is a bosom buddy of the Bush Mob?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deusabscondidum</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12475</link>
		<dc:creator>Deusabscondidum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12475</guid>
		<description>I think what I miss most is being able to wait inside the terminal nearer the runway.  There was something lovely about having a crowd of people waiting there, watching the jet.  Instead of waiting by the baggage claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what I miss most is being able to wait inside the terminal nearer the runway.  There was something lovely about having a crowd of people waiting there, watching the jet.  Instead of waiting by the baggage claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12468</link>
		<dc:creator>Casa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a farm girl and I feel naked without my knife. I&#039;ve only ever flown post 9/11... the local court house does a better job knife finding than airport sec. *rolls eyes*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a farm girl and I feel naked without my knife. I&#8217;ve only ever flown post 9/11&#8230; the local court house does a better job knife finding than airport sec. *rolls eyes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12467</link>
		<dc:creator>Casa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12467</guid>
		<description>Oh shove off 8E. That comment just shows how stupid you are. 
People had alwayes been told to coperate with hijackers in the past for exactly the reasions Turtlegirl listed. Just do what the bad men say and it will be ok, act like a hero and someone gets shot.
Kamakazes are a compleatly diffrent situation. After you&#039;re out of amo, or going down any way, take a few bastards with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh shove off 8E. That comment just shows how stupid you are.<br />
People had alwayes been told to coperate with hijackers in the past for exactly the reasions Turtlegirl listed. Just do what the bad men say and it will be ok, act like a hero and someone gets shot.<br />
Kamakazes are a compleatly diffrent situation. After you&#8217;re out of amo, or going down any way, take a few bastards with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayken</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12462</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12462</guid>
		<description>I believe your roll is important as well. However, it maybe that the published rules are made elsewhere and are easy to understand if passengers just pay attention, but I have run into many cases of the rules being inconsistently applied or new &quot;rules&quot; being made up on the spot by grouchy (bored?) TSA workers (see my comment above.) 
And of course there is the absurdity of some of the rules such as not being able to bring on my computer toolkit (because it has itty bitty screw drivers I might drive through somebody&#039;s eye or something) but the nice lady can bring her knitting needles aboard, no problem. You can hurt someone with those things, ya know! And why can parents of babies bring on formula but I cannot bring on my unsealed soda?  And the 1 quart baggie thing is a joke. 
And I am way not OK with some TSA workers becoming Super Cops and  treating us as if we are all terrorists. Again, only happens to me in the US. The screeners at the airports I have been to outside the US are unfailingly polite and professional. (Can&#039;t say the same thing about the airline ticket agents but that&#039;s a whole &#039;nother bitch session. Also, admittedly I mostly travel to Western Europe so I cannot say that it is ONLY the US that is this bad.) I&#039;ve even sent complaints which probably gets me put on some special list of &quot;troublemakers&quot; or something but serves no other purpose.
On the other hand I have run into many very professional and polite TSA workers and I know a good many of them are really just trying to do their jobs. And I know that the much of the screening stuff is actually useful. I would just like to see good, well-thought-out and  consistently applied security measures rather than the &quot;security theater&quot; absurdity we have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe your roll is important as well. However, it maybe that the published rules are made elsewhere and are easy to understand if passengers just pay attention, but I have run into many cases of the rules being inconsistently applied or new &#8220;rules&#8221; being made up on the spot by grouchy (bored?) TSA workers (see my comment above.)<br />
And of course there is the absurdity of some of the rules such as not being able to bring on my computer toolkit (because it has itty bitty screw drivers I might drive through somebody&#8217;s eye or something) but the nice lady can bring her knitting needles aboard, no problem. You can hurt someone with those things, ya know! And why can parents of babies bring on formula but I cannot bring on my unsealed soda?  And the 1 quart baggie thing is a joke.<br />
And I am way not OK with some TSA workers becoming Super Cops and  treating us as if we are all terrorists. Again, only happens to me in the US. The screeners at the airports I have been to outside the US are unfailingly polite and professional. (Can&#8217;t say the same thing about the airline ticket agents but that&#8217;s a whole &#8216;nother bitch session. Also, admittedly I mostly travel to Western Europe so I cannot say that it is ONLY the US that is this bad.) I&#8217;ve even sent complaints which probably gets me put on some special list of &#8220;troublemakers&#8221; or something but serves no other purpose.<br />
On the other hand I have run into many very professional and polite TSA workers and I know a good many of them are really just trying to do their jobs. And I know that the much of the screening stuff is actually useful. I would just like to see good, well-thought-out and  consistently applied security measures rather than the &#8220;security theater&#8221; absurdity we have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayken</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12459</guid>
		<description>Besides it being a lot of &quot;security theatre&quot; as my security professional BIL likes to say, it is also inconsistently applied. If the the rules were the same each and every time I traveled I wouldn&#039;t be so annoyed. But different airports, hell, different screeners, seem to make things up suddenly out of whole cloth a lot of the time. Most memorable time was when I flew from Oxnard thru LAX to Frankfurt and then back home with an external hard drive in my back pack along with the laptop. At each security check I took out the laptop just as it said to, The rules state nothing about external hard drives so I left it. I got all the way back to LAX and was stopped when I tried to get back through security on the puddle-jumper to OXNARD for crying out loud and asked to take all electronics out. I was informed (quite incorrectly) that one ALWAYS had to take ALL electronic out. Patently untrue. Not on the site, not on their signs. Nowhere. (And I have flown dozens of times post-9/11 with everything from iPods to that external hard drive to automotive diagnostic equipment. This one pissant had to give me trouble when I was jet-lagged and SOOO close to home that I almost said screw it and called my husband to come get me at LAX instead.
I also find it funny that in no other country I have flown to thus far have I ever had to remove my shoes to get through security. &#039;Nother story, much funnier, was the one time I was flying home from Hamburg and my feet were really killing me while waiting in line at security so I took off my dress shoes. The German gentlemen behind me asked his companion if they would have to do that and he replied &quot;No, that&#039;s just a crazy American thing.&quot;
And lastly, someone please tell me why, if we are so much safer screening us, they still don&#039;t screen most cargo that goes on planes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides it being a lot of &#8220;security theatre&#8221; as my security professional BIL likes to say, it is also inconsistently applied. If the the rules were the same each and every time I traveled I wouldn&#8217;t be so annoyed. But different airports, hell, different screeners, seem to make things up suddenly out of whole cloth a lot of the time. Most memorable time was when I flew from Oxnard thru LAX to Frankfurt and then back home with an external hard drive in my back pack along with the laptop. At each security check I took out the laptop just as it said to, The rules state nothing about external hard drives so I left it. I got all the way back to LAX and was stopped when I tried to get back through security on the puddle-jumper to OXNARD for crying out loud and asked to take all electronics out. I was informed (quite incorrectly) that one ALWAYS had to take ALL electronic out. Patently untrue. Not on the site, not on their signs. Nowhere. (And I have flown dozens of times post-9/11 with everything from iPods to that external hard drive to automotive diagnostic equipment. This one pissant had to give me trouble when I was jet-lagged and SOOO close to home that I almost said screw it and called my husband to come get me at LAX instead.<br />
I also find it funny that in no other country I have flown to thus far have I ever had to remove my shoes to get through security. &#8216;Nother story, much funnier, was the one time I was flying home from Hamburg and my feet were really killing me while waiting in line at security so I took off my dress shoes. The German gentlemen behind me asked his companion if they would have to do that and he replied &#8220;No, that&#8217;s just a crazy American thing.&#8221;<br />
And lastly, someone please tell me why, if we are so much safer screening us, they still don&#8217;t screen most cargo that goes on planes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fish</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12442</link>
		<dc:creator>fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12442</guid>
		<description>I appreciate what the screeners are trying to do as much as the next passenger, even if the evidence that it really makes us safer is a little thin. But, there is a big hole in your logic there. A &quot;one in a million&quot; mistake only gets two planes blown up IF every single one of those two million passengers is trying to blow one up. Realistically, it&#039;s more like one in a million passengers has evil intentions, so missing one in a million of them would result in a catastrophe once in about every 1500 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate what the screeners are trying to do as much as the next passenger, even if the evidence that it really makes us safer is a little thin. But, there is a big hole in your logic there. A &#8220;one in a million&#8221; mistake only gets two planes blown up IF every single one of those two million passengers is trying to blow one up. Realistically, it&#8217;s more like one in a million passengers has evil intentions, so missing one in a million of them would result in a catastrophe once in about every 1500 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12433</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12433</guid>
		<description>...yet noone has actually taken on the claims that U_R made about the hijackers. Typical Straw-Man tactics, to steal the debate from the actual point that was being made, That the Hijackers&#039; behavior makes the Official 9/11 Fairy-Tale HIGHLY questionable. Keep in mind that this event is still used to this day as justification for every unpopular government action, from airport cavity-searches to the slaughter of brown people worldwide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;yet noone has actually taken on the claims that U_R made about the hijackers. Typical Straw-Man tactics, to steal the debate from the actual point that was being made, That the Hijackers&#8217; behavior makes the Official 9/11 Fairy-Tale HIGHLY questionable. Keep in mind that this event is still used to this day as justification for every unpopular government action, from airport cavity-searches to the slaughter of brown people worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saywhat</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12408</link>
		<dc:creator>saywhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12408</guid>
		<description>troofers make me lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>troofers make me lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osama Bin Laden</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12387</link>
		<dc:creator>Osama Bin Laden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12387</guid>
		<description>Mission Accomplished!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mission Accomplished!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceefax</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12385</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceefax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12385</guid>
		<description>These &quot;legitimate questions&quot; are usually absolutely cretinous however.  &quot;Fire can&#039;t melt steel!&quot;  Really?  That must be news to the people who used fire to make the steel girders into the right shape in the first place.  &quot;Buildings don&#039;t fall down like that!&quot;  Really?  You were expecting it to topple like a tree?  Which force is acting on the side of the building to cause that to happen?  &quot;They weren&#039;t good enough pilots to do it!&quot;  The hard part of flying is taking off and landing.  Crashing is the easy part.  &quot;No buildings have been completely destroyed by planes crashing into them before, it must have been bombs!&quot;  Most plane crashes happen before landing, with a mostly empty fuel tank and a pilot trying to slow the plane and land safely, not a pilot deliberately slamming the plane into something as hard as possible with a full tank of aviation fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These &#8220;legitimate questions&#8221; are usually absolutely cretinous however.  &#8220;Fire can&#8217;t melt steel!&#8221;  Really?  That must be news to the people who used fire to make the steel girders into the right shape in the first place.  &#8220;Buildings don&#8217;t fall down like that!&#8221;  Really?  You were expecting it to topple like a tree?  Which force is acting on the side of the building to cause that to happen?  &#8220;They weren&#8217;t good enough pilots to do it!&#8221;  The hard part of flying is taking off and landing.  Crashing is the easy part.  &#8220;No buildings have been completely destroyed by planes crashing into them before, it must have been bombs!&#8221;  Most plane crashes happen before landing, with a mostly empty fuel tank and a pilot trying to slow the plane and land safely, not a pilot deliberately slamming the plane into something as hard as possible with a full tank of aviation fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>I remember the pilots also used to hand out pilot pins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the pilots also used to hand out pilot pins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wx_Should_Read_Up</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>Wx_Should_Read_Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>huh? wait. I&#039;ve missed something here, apparently. Someone raises seemingly legitimate questions about 9/11 (of which there are many!), and the best response that they can get is essentially &quot;whoa! that guy must be some kind of terrorist! he needs to die!&quot; ...anyone familiar with the term &quot;newspeak?&quot; It&#039;s really a shame, the kind of place that the United States has turned into. Silly me, I guess 9/11 really DID change everything. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh? wait. I&#8217;ve missed something here, apparently. Someone raises seemingly legitimate questions about 9/11 (of which there are many!), and the best response that they can get is essentially &#8220;whoa! that guy must be some kind of terrorist! he needs to die!&#8221; &#8230;anyone familiar with the term &#8220;newspeak?&#8221; It&#8217;s really a shame, the kind of place that the United States has turned into. Silly me, I guess 9/11 really DID change everything. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12356</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12356</guid>
		<description>LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12355</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12355</guid>
		<description>We need that too! This is the 21st century, damnit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need that too! This is the 21st century, damnit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wx</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12337</link>
		<dc:creator>Wx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12337</guid>
		<description>The kamikaze were a little bit of a different story. Look up the Bushido code. It was also an act of desperation during a shooting war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kamikaze were a little bit of a different story. Look up the Bushido code. It was also an act of desperation during a shooting war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wx</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Wx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>You 9/11 truthers really need to commit collective suicide. Seriously. You are *THAT* useless to the world. The thought of you voting and driving and able to purchase firearms and fertilizer is disturbing. But, oh, wait, Oklahoma city was G-Man operation, too, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You 9/11 truthers really need to commit collective suicide. Seriously. You are *THAT* useless to the world. The thought of you voting and driving and able to purchase firearms and fertilizer is disturbing. But, oh, wait, Oklahoma city was G-Man operation, too, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Min</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12310</link>
		<dc:creator>Min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12310</guid>
		<description>Pre-9/11 airport security was a win, and anybody who thinks that all of the &quot;security&quot; measures that have been implemented since then actually make them safer has been brainwashed by the government&#039;s propaganda.

Being forced to take your shoes off, remove your laptop from its bag, and not take any drinks, nail files, razor blades, etc., through security has not stopped a single terrorist.  Nobody has ever even /tried/ to use any of those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-9/11 airport security was a win, and anybody who thinks that all of the &#8220;security&#8221; measures that have been implemented since then actually make them safer has been brainwashed by the government&#8217;s propaganda.</p>
<p>Being forced to take your shoes off, remove your laptop from its bag, and not take any drinks, nail files, razor blades, etc., through security has not stopped a single terrorist.  Nobody has ever even /tried/ to use any of those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boo hiss</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12308</link>
		<dc:creator>boo hiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12308</guid>
		<description>FAIL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAIL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustav</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12305</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12305</guid>
		<description>No, it didn&#039;t. Free access to the cockpit is what failed to prevent 9/11.

Remember terrorists are about striking fear in society - not about killing the maximum number of people. Terrorists target airlines because we all act paranoid about airline security. If airline security was the same as at the bus station and we weren&#039;t so uptight about it, we&#039;d probably be just as safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it didn&#8217;t. Free access to the cockpit is what failed to prevent 9/11.</p>
<p>Remember terrorists are about striking fear in society &#8211; not about killing the maximum number of people. Terrorists target airlines because we all act paranoid about airline security. If airline security was the same as at the bus station and we weren&#8217;t so uptight about it, we&#8217;d probably be just as safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kashmir</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12301</link>
		<dc:creator>kashmir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12301</guid>
		<description>I tried to get on a plane with a pair of cuticle scissors.  They took them from me.  The &#039;blades&#039; (and that is being kind) were less than half an inch long and had rounded tips.  I suppose I could have brandished them menacingly but I doubt anybody with half a brain would have taken it seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to get on a plane with a pair of cuticle scissors.  They took them from me.  The &#8216;blades&#8217; (and that is being kind) were less than half an inch long and had rounded tips.  I suppose I could have brandished them menacingly but I doubt anybody with half a brain would have taken it seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamarosa</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12297</link>
		<dc:creator>mamarosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12297</guid>
		<description>In my mind: I cannot un-see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my mind: I cannot un-see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>I have a card from United Airlines that says:
&quot;Razors available upon request. Please ask stewardess.&quot;
There was a time when people would shave on an plane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a card from United Airlines that says:<br />
&#8220;Razors available upon request. Please ask stewardess.&#8221;<br />
There was a time when people would shave on an plane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cest</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12294</link>
		<dc:creator>cest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12294</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing an &quot;insider&#039;s&quot; perspective.  I&#039;ve traveled a fair amount pre- and post 9/11, and your comments affirm what I&#039;ve long suspected.  

Some years back (?pre 9/11) 60 Minutes interviewed a man who was (?Israel&#039;s, ?El Al&#039;s) security chief. I think he&#039;d been paid by the U.S. to assess and advise on air travel security.  He had identified some gaping holes and suggested fixes and, if I remember correctly, the U.S. ignored them.  

IMO, most of the Homeland Security Act (a title so reminiscent of something out of Nazi Germany it makes me shudder) was designed to allow the government nearly unfettered access to information and nearly unlimited power over individuals.  I find that idea more frightening than terrorist attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing an &#8220;insider&#8217;s&#8221; perspective.  I&#8217;ve traveled a fair amount pre- and post 9/11, and your comments affirm what I&#8217;ve long suspected.  </p>
<p>Some years back (?pre 9/11) 60 Minutes interviewed a man who was (?Israel&#8217;s, ?El Al&#8217;s) security chief. I think he&#8217;d been paid by the U.S. to assess and advise on air travel security.  He had identified some gaping holes and suggested fixes and, if I remember correctly, the U.S. ignored them.  </p>
<p>IMO, most of the Homeland Security Act (a title so reminiscent of something out of Nazi Germany it makes me shudder) was designed to allow the government nearly unfettered access to information and nearly unlimited power over individuals.  I find that idea more frightening than terrorist attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paden</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12293</link>
		<dc:creator>paden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12293</guid>
		<description>Well, it was half full...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was half full&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paden</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12292</link>
		<dc:creator>paden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12292</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I got in with a quart of milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I got in with a quart of milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cest</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12291</link>
		<dc:creator>cest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 12:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12291</guid>
		<description>Agree.  Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceefax</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceefax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>Oh good a 9/11 truther.  These guys are so cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh good a 9/11 truther.  These guys are so cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nostromo</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12287</link>
		<dc:creator>nostromo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12287</guid>
		<description>The obvious truth is looking at this picture just makes you nostalgic for the world we all used to live in. Whether it was pre 9/11 or whether the intense security began even earlier than that. I&#039;ve ben flying quite often since the late 70&#039;s and I&#039;m sure it didn&#039;t all start at 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious truth is looking at this picture just makes you nostalgic for the world we all used to live in. Whether it was pre 9/11 or whether the intense security began even earlier than that. I&#8217;ve ben flying quite often since the late 70&#8217;s and I&#8217;m sure it didn&#8217;t all start at 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy</title>
		<link>http://onceuponawin.com/2009/05/10/win-pics-pre-911-airport-security/comment-page-1/#comment-12286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onceuponawin.com/?p=3689#comment-12286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to refrain from the debate as to whether this is a true fail or a true win, but will agree that there are things I miss about pre 9-11 security, such as being able to wait for your loved ones at the gate.  

Before I was married and long before 9-11, my then husband-to-be travelled to Oklahoma to visit me and my family.  I had asked my mom to take her phone with me, which she let me.  When I went through the security checkpoint, I was asked to turn the phone on to show that it was truly a phone.  With a chuckle I glibly said, &quot;Lucky for you it really was a phone!&quot;  The security guard laughed and agreed and waved me on.  Now can you imagine what would have happened if I had said that now?  My goodness!  They&#039;d have me pinned to the ground and a swat team swarming on me in a matter of seconds!

As for surviving security, my top tip is wear shoes that you can slip on and off easily.  It saves both you, security and the people behind you a bit of time.  Sadly, it doesn&#039;t really help me now because I have three lit&#039;luns to haul through security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to refrain from the debate as to whether this is a true fail or a true win, but will agree that there are things I miss about pre 9-11 security, such as being able to wait for your loved ones at the gate.  </p>
<p>Before I was married and long before 9-11, my then husband-to-be travelled to Oklahoma to visit me and my family.  I had asked my mom to take her phone with me, which she let me.  When I went through the security checkpoint, I was asked to turn the phone on to show that it was truly a phone.  With a chuckle I glibly said, &#8220;Lucky for you it really was a phone!&#8221;  The security guard laughed and agreed and waved me on.  Now can you imagine what would have happened if I had said that now?  My goodness!  They&#8217;d have me pinned to the ground and a swat team swarming on me in a matter of seconds!</p>
<p>As for surviving security, my top tip is wear shoes that you can slip on and off easily.  It saves both you, security and the people behind you a bit of time.  Sadly, it doesn&#8217;t really help me now because I have three lit&#8217;luns to haul through security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
